!Discover over 1,000 fresh articles every day

Get all the latest

نحن لا نرسل البريد العشوائي! اقرأ سياسة الخصوصية الخاصة بنا لمزيد من المعلومات.

Trump’s Speech Ban Ruling: Everything the Former President Cannot Say in the Cases Against Him – After Being Reinstated by the D.C. Circuit Court

The Federal Election Case:

Trump and other parties and their lawyers cannot say anything regarding witnesses “concerning their potential involvement in the investigation or in this criminal proceeding,” nor can they make public statements about court staff or the case’s lawyers or their families (except for special counsel Jack Smith) if it “originates from an intent to interfere significantly,” according to a ruling by the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday – thus narrowing the order imposed by federal judge Tanya Chutkan.

The Civil Fraud Trial:

Judge Arthur Engoron in New York imposed a ban on Trump and other parties in the ongoing trial accusing the former president and his company of fraud, preventing the parties from making any public comments or posts about court personnel after Trump made a derogatory comment about one of Engoron’s clerks – which was upheld by the appeals court, resulting in a combined $15,000 fine on Trump for violating the order twice.

The Criminal Case in Manhattan:

A protective order has been imposed on Trump and other parties in the criminal case against him in Manhattan regarding hush money payments during the 2016 election campaign, which prohibits Trump and the other parties from copying any evidence in the case or sharing it on social media, and also delays the disclosure of the names of court staff or some witnesses in the case until the jury selection for the trial begins.

The Georgia Election Case:

Under the terms of Trump’s bail agreement in his criminal case in Fulton County, Georgia, for attempting to overturn the 2020 election results, the former president cannot communicate with any co-defendants in the case or any potential witnesses about the facts of the case, nor can he intimidate them or “obstruct justice in any other way.”

The Federal Documents Case:

The bail conditions for Trump in the criminal case against him for retaining White House documents at Mar-a-Lago prohibit him from discussing the case with any witnesses or other defendants like Walt Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira, except through his attorney, and a separate protective order prohibits him from sharing any discovery materials in the case, stating that he can access that information only under direct supervision of his defense lawyer.

Opposition from the Chief Judge:

Trump has strongly opposed the protective orders against him, claiming they violate his freedom of speech and harm his presidential campaign. He has already appealed the protective order in the civil fraud trial to New York’s highest court. The former president stated in a Twitter post on Friday that he would appeal the latest ruling against him that reinstated the election ban, claiming that the order means he “could be prevented from speaking and in a practical sense, telling the truth.” Trump wrote: “In other words, people can speak violently and viciously against me, or attack me in any way, but I am not allowed to respond with equal force. What happens to our First Amendment right, what happens to our country?”

What We Don’t Know:

What penalties Trump will face if he violates the protective orders against him or any conditions of his pre-trial release. Chutkan and the appeals court judges have not provided any details on the penalties the court could impose if Trump violates the protective order in the election case, although Chutkan acknowledged in a session that “the order means nothing if you don’t have a mechanism to enforce it” and stated in a previous ruling that “the court will assess the content and context” of any Trump statements that could be considered violations before determining whether he has violated the order. Engoron threatened “serious penalties” against Trump if he continues to violate the protective order in that case, which the judge said could include higher fines, being held in contempt, or even jail time. In addition to penalties such as potential fines or imprisonment, Politico notes that Chutkan could also restrict Trump’s use of social media, as was the case with Trump ally Roger Stone.

Decisive:

“Trump is a former president and current presidential candidate, and there is strong public interest in what he has to say”, ruled the appellate court panel, which includes judges appointed by Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden. “However, Trump is also a currently indicted criminal, and he must be tried in a courtroom under the same procedures that govern all other criminal defendants. This is what the rule of law means”.

Main Background:

Trump has long attacked his political and judicial opponents on social media and in his public speeches, and his criticisms have intensified as legal cases against him have increased. The former president has repeatedly attacked such prosecutors as Smith, Fulton County DA Fani Willis, and Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg, as well as Chutkan, Engoron, and other judges. He has also made repeated comments about potential witnesses in the federal election case, which prosecutors say warrants a gag order, including comments about Pence and suggesting that then-Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley should be executed. Chutkan cited Trump’s comments about Milley in her order imposing the gag, as well as the former president’s statements where he called potential witnesses liars and suggested that Smith, who leads the federal investigations against Trump, is a “bully”. Engoron’s gag order was the first official gag that stifled Trump when it was imposed on October 3, although whether judges would move to restrict Trump’s free speech had been speculated since his first indictment in March. After Engoron acted, legal experts suggested that Chutkan was likely to follow suit, with the New York judge “breaking the dam” for other judges.

Future Reading:

Trump’s trials in civil and criminal cases are ongoing, and the gag order will remain in effect until these cases conclude. Discussions about free speech and the former president’s rights to express his views are expected to continue, with judges playing a crucial role in determining the limits of these rights and imposing penalties on Trump if he violates the imposed orders.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2023/12/08/trump-gag-orders-heres-everything-the-ex-president-cant-say-in-the-cases-against-him-as-dc-appeals-court-reimposes-order/

.lwrp .lwrp-list-row-container{
display: flex;
justify-content: space-between;
}
.lwrp .lwrp-list-row-container .lwrp-list-item{
width: calc(12% – 20px);
}
.lwrp .lwrp-list-item:not(.lwrp-no-posts-message-item){

}
.lwrp .lwrp-list-item img{
max-width: 100%;
height: auto;
object-fit: cover;
aspect-ratio: 1 / 1;
}
.lwrp .lwrp-list-item.lwrp-empty-list-item{
background: initial !important;
}
.lwrp .lwrp-list-item .lwrp-list-link .lwrp-list-link-title-text,
.lwrp .lwrp-list-item .lwrp-list-no-posts-message{

}@media screen and (max-width: 480px) {
.lwrp.link-whisper-related-posts{

}
.lwrp .lwrp-title{

}.lwrp .lwrp-description{

}
.lwrp .lwrp-list-multi-container{
flex-direction: column;
}
.lwrp .lwrp-list-multi-container ul.lwrp-list{
margin-top: 0px;
margin-bottom: 0px;
padding-top: 0px;
padding-bottom: 0px;
}
.lwrp .lwrp-list-double,
.lwrp .lwrp-list-triple{
width: 100%;
}
.lwrp .lwrp-list-row-container{
justify-content: initial;
flex-direction: column;
}
.lwrp .lwrp-list-row-container .lwrp-list-item{
width: 100%;
}
.lwrp .lwrp-list-item:not(.lwrp-no-posts-message-item){

}
.lwrp .lwrp-list-item .lwrp-list-link .lwrp-list-link-title-text,
.lwrp .lwrp-list-item .lwrp-list-no-posts-message{

};
}


Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *