Scientists must exercise caution when using productivity AI tools like ChatGPT to write grant proposals (see J. M. Parrilla Nature 623, 443; 2023). Writing and thinking are not separable activities. The text generated by AI may lack meaning because it is not grounded in a deep understanding of the context of the scientific problem, the research gap, the broader social impact, the ethical responsibilities involved, and the values of the researcher.
Warning Against Using AI in Grant Proposal Writing
Scientists should be cautious when using productivity AI tools like ChatGPT to write grant proposals. The text produced by AI may lack meaning due to its lack of grounding in a deep understanding of the context of the scientific problem, the research gap, the broader social impact, the ethical responsibilities involved, and the values of the researcher.
The Ethical Impact of Using AI in Scientific Writing
Scientists must consider the ethical impact of using AI in scientific writing. The text generated by AI may lack meaning because it is not based on a deep understanding of the context of the scientific problem, the research gap, the broader social impact, the ethical responsibilities involved, and the values of the researcher. Scientists should exercise caution and use AI judiciously when writing their scientific papers.
Leave a Reply