!Discover over 1,000 fresh articles every day

Get all the latest

نحن لا نرسل البريد العشوائي! اقرأ سياسة الخصوصية الخاصة بنا لمزيد من المعلومات.

How to Present a Report to the Wise.

When referees are asked to evaluate the final reviews of a research paper, they are informed of the decisions made by the editors. When we ask referees to re-review a manuscript that has been revised in response to their critiques, we usually send them copies of the comments from other referees. We routinely inform referees of our decisions and send copies of the reports from other referees via email. We typically inform referees if a research paper has been accepted despite their negative recommendation. Referees who are bypassed should understand that this does not imply any lack of confidence in their assessment; it is common for experts to disagree, and in the absence of consensus, editors must reach a decision in one direction or another.

Policies and Procedures

The journal follows specific policies and procedures for providing referee reports. Referees must adhere to these policies and procedures when writing their reports. This includes clarifying the criteria that were used in evaluating the research paper and presenting their recommendations clearly and logically.

How to Write a Report

When writing a report for referees, the report should include a summary of the research paper and a comprehensive evaluation of its quality and scientific significance. The report should also include clear and logical recommendations regarding the acceptance, rejection, or request for further revisions of the paper.

How to Submit a Report

When submitting a report for referees, it should be properly formatted and include all necessary information. The report should contain information about the submitted research paper, including its title, authors, and abstract. The report should also include clear and logical recommendations regarding the acceptance, rejection, or request for further revisions of the paper.

Revisions and Comments

When revisions are submitted for the research paper in response to the referees’ comments, referees should re-review the paper and provide additional comments if necessary. The feedback should be constructive and detailed, contributing to the improvement of the quality of the research paper. Referees should be informed of our final decisions and sent copies of other referee reports via email.

Acknowledgment of Efforts

The efforts of referees in evaluating the research paper should be acknowledged. This can be done by mentioning the names of the referees in the research paper or granting them an official certificate of appreciation. The contributions of referees should be valued, and their important role in the development of scientific knowledge should be recognized.

Source: http://www.nature.com/nature/for-referees/revisions-and-feedback


Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *